![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhNVAHpvF_gEu8Nn4I7z5plBsNHhJx62vCct7h-87Cg6ZC2R8afHOzfov4qCPu12Lgre6jsyJrNl3r1ERR4Dai1TBLYMeIY_tNQNIe-Ghg_DHtrHagdau7emcfJ_869bAaTk0vK/s400/L551713+side.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg9k2Yas2rrJ-F_R22hmaayP80BESGy2n6vax4Vgs7smFrvgatTGtx7fBCl7-_Pv4YCijUvwjDZOMyHSMu3n_My26GoeMBLND1rrBiCeEP8XGBp8wUXhhQwO65_G8vhtR3sIYt1/s400/L551713+utc.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjMwFvCLmxyQjUoJbVqEXNi8_PrhlEgFtkyNM0tFSBuvwXbpEvWR1wR5QxOwx0NgU_mIbsWu8-FX3DQelnUrZJ5jnkHFe8qyucX1uj2KOsMAuf0u9Orze0v3fj9bqOAWEnH5P0w/s400/L551713+rump.jpg)
This is yet another interesting individual, it is also a 1st year female and has quite a frosty appearance however its wing length (67mm) is at the lowest end of Lesser Redpoll and 1mm off the start of the female Common Redpoll range. At a push, on plumage I think this probably is a Common Redpoll but maybe better left...
No comments:
Post a Comment